Evidence and Truth
Like a few others that have already posted, I also thought the concept of image as evidence was interesting. The article talked about the camera as an “objective device for the capturing of reality” (p. 280). This simplified statement has limitations, which the article mentions, considering that the “reality” captured is socially and culturally influenced. Despite cameras capturing what it real, a range of beliefs and biases will evoke differing emotional responses. This image of Dr. King marching arm-in-arm with white men during the Civil Rights Movement is a perfect example of a highly emotional image.
Interestingly, the authors bring up the issue of image altering. Although the camera may have captured reality, we often are unaware if an image has been modified after its capture. They mention the video, The Silent Scream, in an effort to provide an example of visual manipulation to demonstrate “truth.” They go further to suggest that even after the public knows that images have been manipulated beyond their initial reality, sometimes their power remains. A powerful visual image may leave a lasting emotional impact despite how it represented truth and reality.
I am a Communication and Media Technology student. My goal is to advance my understanding of communication, especially as it relates to marketing and organizations. I am quite happy working for my department at RIT and we'll see where the future takes me! I am passionate about graphic design and hope to have opportunities to build on these skills. My family consists of my husband (a soon-to-be brewmaster) and my silly labradoodle!