We are a large school district that continually battles to maintain our Deaf Ed pre-school, self-contained, for 2 year olds. We firmly believe the benefits for a Deaf child entering school even for half a day at the age of 2 to 2 1/2 with other D/HH peers has immeasurable outcomes. However, the district keeps pushing for the entrance age of 3. Do you have any information that would support our efforts to see to it that these little ones receive language as early as possible? We do have teachers going into the home as soon as the child is identified but truly believe the interaction at age 2 with like peers is so beneficial.
I do not know of any empirical evidence that shows that children benefit from group work as a 2 year old. What we do know, though, is that children do learn language from their peers. But my question is whether this happens at the young age of 2 years or is it more likely at 3 years of age when children play more interactively. This probably depends on the cognitive/play skills of the child.
My suggestion is to collect some information while you can. If you were to collect developmental information about these children and if you show one year’s growth in communication/language in one year’s time, then you might be well on your way to showing the value of this group.
In most states, it is unusual for programs like this to start at 2 years of age. I’m impressed that yours does. If you were to collect some evidence it may help others working in other programs as well as your own effort. It seems logical that there is an advantage. More stimulation has to be good, right? But in today’s climate, it’s becoming an expectation to have evidence to show the benefit.
My two-year-old daughter is deaf. Where can I find videos like My Baby Can Read to help teach her how to read and use sign language. I have found that Signing Time is geared toward hearing children and does not present the signs well enough. I can’t seem to find FUN videos for my two-year-old to help us learn. There need to be more materials toward children with hearing loss that include motion, don’t you think? Or, am I alone in this thought?
First of all, give yourself a pat on the back for knowing the critical part parents play in the literacy process. You are your child’s first and best teacher. Initially it’s all about language and providing your child full access to the world around them. This entails giving your child a consistent way to communicate, learn and make a link between speech/signs and print. Through your consistent model of language, your child can identify, comment and think about the things he’ll later read about.(i.e a rabbit is a furry animal with long ears). We do know that all deaf or hearing children need to recognize alphabet letters quickly and accurately and if possible link those letters to their sound (Visual Phonics cue) or lip formation. So always remember to turn on the Closed Captions for television shows and movies.
I’m not sure where your family lives but many schools for the deaf offer a Sharing Reading Program. Shared Reading ( a program developed at Gallaudet ) provides a deaf mentor along with DVDs to teach parents how to share classic children’s literate in ASL.
One website that might provide some helpful resources Is the Center for Accessible Technology in Sign (CATS). CATS is dedicated to providing accessibility to learning via sign language. CATS’ goal is to enhance language, literacy and general world knowledge by providing tools that make text, captions, video, web pages, and multimedia accessible to deaf users, particularly children. – http://www.cc.gatech.edu/program/cats/
Also available through CATS
1001Books in ASL – http://www.cc.gatech.edu/program/cats/1001%20books/index.htm
Also, many libraries have available an ASL Access Video Collection (with over 200 ASL videos for loan). Currently they are housed in 28 locations nationwide, in 14 states and the District of Columbia (Current Locations).- http://www.aslaccess.org/locations.htm
Born to Sign – http://www.signwithme.com/002_browse_signs.asp
There is also a ASL Vlog and Video – http://www.aslvlog.net/index.php?c=28
Is it essential to address hearing loss before a child reaches the age of seven years?
Absolutely!! The ideal age for addressing hearing loss (effective parenting techniques, effective exposure to language, consideration of assistive listening devices, etc.) is from birth. Recent research has demonstrated that when deaf children are identified and receive early intervention services within the first six months of life, their language abilities are much more likely to fall within the normal range for hearing children by the time they enter school. Strategies for ensuring effective access to language, supporting social-emotional development, and all of the other issues noted above are essential as early as possible in order to ensure normal development…and providing them after the age at which hearing children are starting to aquire language definitely is not “normal.”
All of that said, “better late than never.” If those early opportunities have been missed, the situation calls for even more vigorous, concerted efforts by all involved.
I am a teacher of the Deaf who works in early intervention, pre-k, as well as school age. Some of my colleagues and I have been discussing how to determine the amount of services a child receives. Is there any standardized way, or at least guidelines that have been developed for this?
For children birth to 36 months of age, Part C of IDEA assures that each child has access to services. A description of these services is identified in the Individual Family Service Plan (IFSP). The IFSP is a written plan. It documents the desired outcomes for the infant or toddler’s development and services to be provided to the child and the child’s family. The IFSP includes statements of the child’ s present level of development, the family’s resources, as well as their priorities and concerns, the major outcomes expected, a statement of necessary early intervention services, and the frequency of services.
When the IFSP is individualized, as it should be, the frequency of services may change. Sometimes the frequency of visits decreases (because the child is doing so well) and sometimes it increases. Frequency of services may increase when there is a significant change (e.g., diagnosis of a second disability, receiving a cochlear implant, progressive hearing loss, etc). The way the law is written, the frequency of services should be prescriptive. Unfortunately, it has been difficult to move away from the time-honored perspective of ongoing weekly visits.
Further reading: Stredler-Brown, A. (2009). Intervention, education, and therapy for children who are deaf or hard of hearing (pp. 934-954). In J. Katz, L. Medwetsky, R. Burkard, & L. Hood (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.