Nasty Women and Bad Hombres Gender and Race in the 2016 US Presidential Election
This webinar looks at how Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and American voters invoked ideas of gender and race in the fiercely contested 2016 US presidential election. RIT professors Christine Kray and Tamar Carroll will talk about their new book, Nasty Women and Bad Hombres: Gender and Race in the 2016 US Presidential Election (University of Rochester Press, 2018).\n\nThe book's essays look at the often vitriolic rhetoric that characterized the election: \"nasty women\" vs. \"deplorables\"; \"bad hombres\" and \"Crooked Hillary,\" analyzing it in terms of gender, race, and their intersections. The election was 'historic' because Clinton was the first woman nominated by a major political party for the presidency. Yet it was also 'historic' in its generation of sustained reflection on the past. Clinton's campaign linked her with suffragist struggles--represented perhaps most poignantly by the parade of visitors to Susan B. Anthony's grave on Election Day--while Trump harnessed nostalgia through his promise to Make America Great Again.\n\nGender and racial hierarchies intersected and reinforced one another throughout the campaign season. Trump's association of Mexican immigrants with crime, and specifically with rape, for example, drew upon a long history of fearmongering that stereotypes Mexican men--and men of other immigrant and minority groups--as sexual aggressors against white women. At the same time, in response to both Trump's misogynistic rhetoric and the iconic power of Clinton's candidacy, feminist consciousness grew steadily across the nation. The book's epilogue considers post-election developments like the Women's March and #metoo.