Cooley
First Name
Frances
Last Name
Cooley
Department
Liberal Studies
Scholarship Year
2025
Research Center
Sensory, Perceptual, and Cognitive Ecology (SPaCE) center
Scholarship Type
Journal Paper
Contributors List
Casey Stringer, Elizabeth R. Schotter, Emily Saunders, Frances G. Cooley, Grace Sinclair, Karen Emmorey
Project Title
dentifying text-based factors that contribute to the superior reading efficiency of skilled deaf readers: An eye-tracking study of length, frequency, and predictability.
Start Date - Month
February
Start Date - Year
2022
End Date Anticipated - Month
February
End Date Anticipated - Year
2025
End Date Actual - Month
February
End Date Actual - Year
2025
Review Types
Blind Peer Reviewed
Student Assistance
None
Projected Cost
$0.00
Funding Source
Grant
Resulting Product
Yes
Citation

Cooley, Frances G., et al. "Identifying text-based factors that contribute to the superior reading efficiency of skilled deaf readers: An eye-tracking study of length, frequency, and predictability." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 51. 7 (2025): 1178-1189. Print. *

Abstract

Skilled deaf readers are more efficient than their hearing counterparts—they read faster, skipping more words without a negative impact on comprehension. It is not clear from where deaf readers’ efficiency derives, because reading is a complex cognitive process that requires readers to extract meaning from text, incorporating visual, lexical, and contextual information. To assess the contributions of these factors to deaf readers’ efficiency, we tracked their eye movements as they read sentences with target words that were manipulated for length, frequency, and predictability, and we assessed the effects of those variables on skipping probability (i.e., whether the reader skipped or fixated the target) and gaze duration (i.e., the amount of time spent fixating the word before leaving it) and compared these patterns to hearing readers with equivalent reading comprehension skill. Deaf readers demonstrated increased skipping rates and shorter gaze durations overall compared to hearing readers and exhibited different patterns of word length and predictability effects, but similar frequency effects. Deaf readers’ eye movements reflect visual linguistic processing expertise as they are primarily driven by word length when targeting words for fixation, but frequency and predictability effects on word skipping indicate that they do engage in parafoveal linguistic processing. These results emphasize the qualitative differences in reading strategies between deaf and hearing readers and advance our understanding of the impact of early language and sensory experiences on reading behaviors.

264472