Educational Effectiveness Assessment

Educational Effectiveness Assessment

  • About Us
    • Mission and Goals
    • Team
  • Academic Programs
    • For Faculty
      • Program Assessment
      • Developing Student Learning Outcomes
      • Developing a PLOAP
      • Curriculum Mapping
      • New Academic Programs
    • Academic Program Improvement
      • Completing a Progress Report
      • Results and Trends
    • Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Committee
    • Course Level Assessment
      • Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in an Online Environment
      • Classroom Assessment Techniques
      • Rubrics
    • Workshops and Training
    • Provost Learning Outcomes Award
  • General Education
    • Curriculum and Framework
    • Outcomes, Rubrics, and Results
    • Assessment Plan and Schedule
    • Reports
    • For Faculty
      • Assess an Outcome
      • Design a General Education Course
      • Faculty Teams
      • Assignment Library
      • Get Involved
    • Committees
      • General Education Assessment Advisory Council (GEAAC)
      • General Education Committee (GEC)
  • Institutional Improvement
    • Planning and Assessing
      • RIT's Strategic Plan
      • Institutional Assessment Framework
    • Administrative Strategic Goals
      • Institutional Effectiveness (IE) Map
      • IE Progress Report
      • IE Report Analysis and Results
      • Workshops and Training
    • University Assessment Council
    • University Data and Information
    • University Level Goals: Academic Programs
    • Educational Goals & Outcomes
      • Critical Thinking
      • Global Interconnectedness
      • Ethical Reasoning
      • Integrative Literacies
      • Creative and Innovative Thinking
      • General Education Student Learning Outcomes
  • Assessment Management
    • Assessment Management System (AMS)
    • Taskstream by Watermark™ (AMS) Sign In
    • Academic Program Support
      • Academic Program - Assessment Planning and Implementation
      • Academic Program - FAQs
      • Academic Program Improvement Progress Report
      • Academic Program - Training
    • Administrative Unit Support
      • Administrative Unit - Assessment Planning and Implementation
      • Administrative Unit - FAQs
      • Institutional Effectiveness Progress Report
      • Administrative Unit - Training

You are here

Fall 2019
/

Continuous Improvement - What’s the Secret?

Archive

  • Fall 2019
  • Spring 2018
Continuous Improvement - What’s the Secret?

Continuous Improvement - What’s the Secret?

RIT’s goal is that 100% of academic programs will demonstrate data-driven continuous improvement on the annual Academic Program Improvement Progress Report. After a decade of collecting Progress Reports, and with results remaining steady at around 85% (of programs demonstrating continuous improvement) for the past four years, it is a good time to provide examples of how academic programs have successfully articulated improvement efforts via their annual report, earning a rating of “Advanced” on the Continuous Improvement Rubric. Progress Report completers often ask what the secret is to receiving an “Advanced” rating. There is no secret! Advanced ratings are given to programs that articulate the following actions:

  1. Annual assessment of student learning outcomes
  2. Analysis of results
  3. Description of how results are used to make changes
  4. Re-assessment of program improvement over multiple academic years. What was the impact of the change?

Changes May Not Equal Improvement…and that’s Ok

The BS Computer Science program analyzes final exam scores in a core course to measure the extent to which their students are able to apply computer science theories and principles. The benchmark is for 80% of students to score a B or higher on this critical exam. This target was not reached and, in response, the program took several actions. First, they revised the exam to better align to the key competencies they sought to measure. Additionally, the program incorporated methods to reinforce the key competencies and new assessment opportunities to supplement the final exam. When the outcome was re-assessed the following year, results indicated that the changes did not result in improved student performance. After extensive faculty consultation, the program recommended modifying prerequisites to enhance students’ level of preparedness and changing the course designation to reflect the rigor of the course.  Subsequent analysis reinforced that students who took the prerequisite performed at a higher level.   

Building Sustainable Practices

The MS Criminal Justice program analyzed their students’ ability to conduct graduate level research. The target is for 70% students to complete the Capstone Project Defense with a grade of “B or above,” demonstrating competencies such as critical thinking and effective communication skills. The program was proud to see that the target was achieved but noted that a more collaborative, committee-based approach would improve the feedback provided to students and enhance project quality. Additionally, the program anticipated an increase in the number of students (and subsequent projects), making sustainability of grading processes a key factor in planning for the future. A comprehensive review of Capstone Projects was implemented, including all program faculty in the process. The following year, all of the students passed with A grades.  The program plans to continue this approach and will be developing a web-based course shell to assist with the review of Capstone working papers.

Keeping an Eye on Improvement

The BS in Hospitality and Tourism Management, RIT Croatia assessed their students’ ability to work successfully in global business environment. The program focuses on effective oral, written, and visual communication skills and uses a Senior Research Project as an assessment opportunity. Students in the program exceeded the target score on the project; however, faculty identified the need to provide formative feedback to students throughout the project. The program introduced ‘milestones’ with structured deadlines and faculty mentoring and feedback that required students to complete portions of the project throughout the semester. The program re-assessed student learning the following year and found that project scores had improved, concluding that the milestones helped students to better manage their time and to approach the senior research project in a more organized manner.

It’s no longer a secret; all programs can achieve an “Advanced” continuous improvement rating with the requisite planning, iteration, and collaborative reflection. Contact the Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment for assistance with your program’s continuous improvement efforts.

Division of Academic Affairs

Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment

Rochester Institute of Technology
12 Lomb Memorial Drive
Rochester, NY 14623-5608


Copyright © Rochester Institute of Technology

All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer. Copyright Infringement

Rochester Institute of Technology

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn

Contact Us