Home Page


Applied
Critical Thinking
Eugene H. Fram Chair in Applied Critical Thinking
Eugene H. Fram
Professor Emeritus
Jennifer Schneider
Eugene Fram Chair
News on Critical Thinking
-
December 10, 2020
RIT’s Fram Chair delivers presentation about COVID-19 to medical professionals
Dr. Jennifer Schneider, CIH, at Rochester Institute of Technology, presented to Occupational and Environmental Medicine medical professionals during a virtual URMC Grand Rounds session called “Riding the Perfect Storm: COVID-19 at the Confluence of Community & Occupational Health.”
-
July 30, 2020
RIT to monitor wastewater for signs of surges in coronavirus cases before symptoms set in
RIT will use an unusual technique to search for surges in coronavirus cases before those infected even begin displaying symptoms. The university will test wastewater on campus for traces of COVID-19 twice weekly beginning Aug. 5 to get early indications if coronavirus is spreading in campus housing and other areas of campus.
-
July 14, 2020
RIT strategically upgrades campus to prevent the spread of coronavirus
In a biology lab in Gosnell Hall, Professor André Hudson has been spending hours this summer testing products to see whether they are effective at killing and filtering microorganisms such as viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The effort is part of RIT’s Infrastructure and Health Technologies task force, which is putting changes in place to make RIT’s campus as safe and clean as possible in the fall.
-
August 29, 2019
Students of the Future: RIT’s Critical Thinking initiative contributes to skilled leaders of the future
More than 30 faculty and staff from 12 colleges across the country met this past August at the AITU Summit: Advancing Student Thinking for 21st Century Success. Organized and led by RIT, participants discussed how critical thinking is essential in today’s complex society.
Community of Practice
Critical thinking is the stepping back and seeing the big picture that enables the generation of new knowledge, making scientific progress without a roadmap.
Applied critical thinking is a necessity for those to consider and offer honest perspectives on controversial topics that matter to them in today’s world
This ability to create the failure of the design is more important than having it succeed.
People with critical thinking abilities are readily adaptable when they face situations in which there are no clear-cut answers.
I love the diversity and variability that goes with tackling large scientific problems.
By developing students’ critical thinking skills and creating opportunities for them to practice critical thinking while at RIT, they can be in a better position to consider the long-term impact of their design decisions.
The best part of my job is to encourage overwhelmed students to think first and click second.
The key to success is to realize that every solution and development impacts people in expected and unexpected ways. Questioning various perspectives and assumptions, hopefully, leads to better solutions.
Education should and can be a stimulating collaboration between knowledge seekers. The outcome can be a brilliant success or a dismal failure, but the learning and thinking process is always instructive for the participants.
By probing how we think about thinking, we become better at making good decisions rapidly.
The ability to self-critique and self-correct one’s own solutions before acting on them is important in any field.
We use a wide variety of activities to encourage students to draw connections among topics and to examine how they learn.
Critical thinking for an organization needs structure and facilitation, opportunity for dialogue, occasional conflict and lots of communication.
In computer science we deal with many different algorithms to solve different problems, but it is very important to understand which algorithm is appropriate for a given problem.
Organizations are complex things involving complex relationships among people. If you’re not constantly applying critical thinking as you manage them, you’ll make mistakes.
Critical engagement with a given topic is the first step in any creative process, from the design of a research project to a video game.
The concept of critical making is oftentimes limited to the creation of physical components but in reality, it covers any way of turning abstract thoughts into organized elements that can be experienced by oneself and shared with others.
Introducing students to the concepts and practices of applied critical thinking in their first semester at RIT is important for creating an early understanding that ACT is an expectation RIT community members have of one another.
A critical thinker benefits from a clarity and an objectivity that helps strike the right emotional tone and lead an individual toward a positive outcome.
If you can’t define, analyze and critique games you can’t learn to make good ones, you can just hope you hit it lucky by accident.
Taking the time to learn from each other and recognize what types of problems are being solved and in what ways can make you a better thinker and solver within your discipline.
Critical thinking and data provide a way to distance yourself form your biases and examine problems more rationally.
I would argue that the times during the day when you are thinking critical outweigh the times you are not – especially in academia – and especially in science.
Ideally students begin to see that their ideas only get better and more viable as they adapt them to critique and concerns from different points of view.
An important bridge between the humanities and science is critical thinking.
Teaching the skills and knowledge to operate in a highly competitive environment allows for the opportunity to challenge thought and decision making.
Critical thinking provides a set of tools that can help us to understand the sources of our beliefs and, when appropriate, the ability to examine their validity.
Students learn it’s not about the end result, but the process they took to get there.
At every opportunity, I try to put students in the role of an industry professional approaching the problem.
Through students’ educational journey, they will encounter a rich diversity of knowledge, beliefs, and opinions that may be congruous or incongruous with theirs.
Critical thinking involves patiently sifting through permutations of possibilities to discover a best course—not just best in a mean/average sense, but taking into account how robust a choice might be to unexpected developments.
When they are faced with a system design, students must think critically to first decompose the system into functional units and then draw from their toolbox to identify the correct components to meet the function of that unit.
Students spend a majority of their life outside the classroom, surrounded by opportunities to hold what they’re learning academically up to the complexities of their lives.